AI & Privacy Governance and Security Assurance
VEGA helps EU-facing organizations translate regulatory expectations into clear ownership, defensible controls, practical evidence, and governance routines that can survive scrutiny.
OFFERINGS
Three connected capability domains
Each domain connects advisory input to practical engagements, concrete outputs, and governance improvements that can be owned by real teams.
OFFERING 01
Expertise
AI initiatives need clear ownership, lifecycle controls, and defensible decisions before they can be scaled responsibly.
- AI governance policy and role clarity
- EU AI Act readiness planning
- AI risk and control mapping
Typical engagements
EU AI Act readiness assessment
Review AI use cases, roles, obligations, and governance gaps against relevant EU AI Act expectations.
AI governance operating model design
Define decision forums, ownership, lifecycle checkpoints, escalation routes, and reporting routines.
AI risk and control mapping
Connect AI risks, safeguards, control expectations, evidence needs, and follow-up actions.
Typical outputs
- AI governance policy
- AI use-case classification logic
- AI risk register
- EU AI Act readiness roadmap
- Management reporting pack
- AI decision-rights matrix
OFFERING 02
Expertise
Privacy risks increase when lawful basis, transparency, DPIA thinking, and accountability evidence are handled too late.
- GDPR compliance assessment
- DPIA and impact-assessment support
- Privacy-by-design governance
Typical engagements
GDPR and AI privacy assessment
Review lawful basis, transparency, minimization, retention, and accountability evidence for AI-enabled processing.
DPIA and PIA support
Structure privacy-risk assessment, stakeholder input, risk treatment, and decision documentation.
Privacy-by-design implementation support
Translate privacy requirements into practical checkpoints, design decisions, and evidence expectations.
Typical outputs
- DPIA / PIA record
- Lawful basis assessment
- Data-flow overview
- Privacy-by-design checklist
- Accountability evidence matrix
- Privacy risk treatment log
OFFERING 03
Expertise
Security governance becomes fragile when risk treatment, ISO 27001 alignment, audit readiness, and evidence quality are disconnected.
- ISO 27001 alignment
- Security governance operating model design
- Control evidence mapping
Typical engagements
ISO 27001 alignment review
Review governance, control ownership, risk treatment, documentation, and evidence readiness.
Security assurance preparation
Prepare operating routines, management review input, internal audit readiness, and follow-up mechanisms.
Control evidence and remediation governance
Map control expectations to evidence, identify gaps, structure remediation actions, and prepare for scrutiny.
Typical outputs
- ISO 27001 alignment map
- Security operating model
- Control evidence matrix
- Evidence quality review
- Audit preparation pack
- Remediation tracker
